MooT Question Icon
Etymology-wise, what part of a circle is a beam of light?




Etymology, Etymology, and more Etymology
as well as grammar, usage, euphemism, slang, jargon, semantics (meaning), linguistics, neologism, idiom, word origin, syntax, dialect, lexicon (vocabulary), diction, pidgin, synonym, antonym, homonym, cant, argot, lingo, and redundancy.


A picture of a moot game

The critically-acclaimed board game MooT consists of tough questions about the nuances of the English language.
To join our mailing list and get free brain-twisting MooT questions sent to you irregularly, enter your email address and then press submit.

E-Mail address:




Back to home page



Answer: the radius

The straight-line distance from the centre of a circle to its circumference is called the radius, which means "beam of light" in Latin.


Please note that these are draft questions for the board game MooT.
If you spot an error or disagree with anything I've said here,
please let me know and I'll fix it.
(the Mootguy)

Feedback


As worded, I think this question is bad. I suggest, "Etymologically speaking, what part of a circle is a beam of light?" Except in an etymological sense, no part of a circle is a beam of light. Good point. I'll change it.
x-derek-@-westenlaw.com
______________________________________________________________

Actually, the radius isn't PART of a circle at all, it's a characteristic of a circle. Perhaps "one radian" would be a more appropriate answer, since this actually represents PART of a circle.

An analogy: We know that Bob's arm is part of Bob. But is Bob's height part of Bob? Maybe "aspect" is a better word. Thus the questions becomes: "Etymology-wise, what aspect of a circle is a ray of light?"
x-anonymous
______________________________________________________________

The wording is a bit tricky since, as you point out, the radius is not part of a circle in the same way that Bob's arm is a part of Bob.

The latter is a constituent part: if you removed it, part of Bob would be missing. However, the radius is a mental extrapolation; remove it from the circle and the circle would still be there.

Now there's a good piss-you-off moot question for you: Is the circle's radius part of the circle? That question homes in on the meaning of part, a word that we all thought we knew the meaning of before this question.(I would also change "the circle" to "a circle.") I agree. Done. I'll try your question out at the next live MooT game we have in Vancouver.
x-jacko-@-lycos.com
______________________________________________________________

Copyright 1998-2008 Blair Arts Ltd. All rights reserved.