Use just four letters to translate
the phrase by and of itself into
Latin.
Etymology, Etymology, and more Etymology
as well as grammar, usage, euphemism, slang, jargon, semantics (meaning), linguistics, neologism, idiom, word origin, syntax, dialect, lexicon (vocabulary), diction, pidgin, synonym, antonym, homonym, cant, argot, lingo, and redundancy.
The critically-acclaimed board game
MooT
consists of tough questions about the nuances of the English language.
Answer:
per se
The four letters are: p, e, r, and
s.
Please note that these are draft questions for the board game MooT.
If you spot an error or disagree with anything I've said here,
please let me know and I'll fix it.
(the Mootguy)
Feedback
Clever! First I thought of sui generis (too many letters), and then
ibid (right number of letters, but not DISTINCT letters). I had a feeling I was
wrong, but came to the site anyway. Too soon! I would have thought of per se
eventually.
x-james.t.wood@msn.com
______________________________________________________________
Hey! I did it!
x-chuckdavis@nshaw.ca
______________________________________________________________
Subtle dirty trick! I got it but counted it as five letters. OK you
are correct, five characters, four letters. Good on ya!
x-dsmith@zapeng.ncom
______________________________________________________________
I got the answer, but wasn't sure at first.
I took "4 letters" quantitatively.
x-gregfelton@-shaw.ca
______________________________________________________________
Would "ipso" be the same? As in ipso facto...
"Ipso" doesn't mean "by and of
itself."
x-acenyc28@-hotmail.com
______________________________________________________________
What's the trick? Counting FIVE letters and calling them FOUR
letters?
x-mike@instrumentation.com
______________________________________________________________
That was tricky, indeed :) Thanks for stirring those brain cells.
x-nadia.toromanova@gmail.com
______________________________________________________________
stinkers. 4 letters...
x-Joe@JoeBarfield.com
______________________________________________________________
In a learner context this would be considered an unreasonable task
as you have not stipulated that one of the letters can be used twice. It is the
same as saying in mathematics: Use two numbers to make eleven and then giving
the answer as 1 and 1. Your emails and thoughts, however, are always
interseting and thought-provoking. My daily wade through my emails would not be
the same without them, for which I thank you.
x-henrypage@btinternet.com
______________________________________________________________
The question was not fair "per se" has x5 letters not x4 Also, "per
se" is not a single word. Sure this expression has only x4 different letters
but you should have indicated that in your question
x-BRONOWSKIOFFICE@yahoo.co.uk
______________________________________________________________
Ya got me.....
x-Lynnnnuk@aol.com
______________________________________________________________
Give me a break!!!!!
x-gellman@wgglaw.com
______________________________________________________________
pAh, and I was going for 'solo'. Of course, following the pattern of
your calculations, that's only 3 letters.
x-aulhamel@-fastermail.com
______________________________________________________________
This was evil!!!!!!!!!! You've developed a wicked side.....more
please
x-pmspitoni-@hotmail.com
______________________________________________________________
That's a bit misleading. One ordinarily thinks of letter tokens,
rather than letter types. (E.g. is 'element' a 7 letter word or a 5-letter
word? Most people would say 7, I think.)
x-rfbjr2@-aol.com
______________________________________________________________
I, too, was stumped-- but in re-reading the challenge, I found no
trickery there!
x-
l_korpi@hotmail.com
______________________________________________________________
Flashed on your little trick right away, but only because, as a former student
of Latin, was SO familiar with the answer. The fans have a right to be furious
(learner context, etc.) YET at heart I'm with the one who wrote, "That was
evil!!..more please."
x-slundgren@warnerpacific.edu
______________________________________________________________
Copyright 1998-2008 Blair Arts Ltd. All rights reserved.